End Liberalism Now

You can say what you want about Delaware Republican candidate for Senate Christine O'Donnell. But what the anonymous mental midget did on the Gawker website was disgusting. First off, I don't believe in anonymity. If you are too chicken to be held accountable for your own words and actions you shouldn't be allowed to express. The First Amendment doesn't protect a right to being anonymous. It only protects your right to speak. So, I'd be quite happy to get rid off anonymity.

Now, having said that, let me say this: I hate liberalism. It is godless. It is gutless. It is a liar, disguising itself as altruism. Every liberal I've ever met either turned out NOT to be truly a liberal--they were simply ignorant about what makes a liberal or conservative--or were ultimately looking after Number One. Oh, to be sure, you'll not often get them to admit it or even realize it, but if you ask the right questions you can almost guarantee you'll find the selfish part that makes them support liberal causes.

The reason I say it's godless is that the more liberal the person is the further from anything scriptural they get. Prove me wrong! In contrast, the more conservative a person is you'll find that they rely more heavily on scriptural teachings. I'm not saying they are saints, I'm not even saying they are believers or born again. But you'll almost always find, in the political arena, the largest difference between a liberal and a conservative is that a conservative will more likely espouse a more Biblical worldview and make every attempt to hide any behaviors that betray that perspective......the liberal will most likely abandon all pretense of a Biblical worldview and even actively demean those who hold such a view. I'll direct your attention to almost every race in the current election to prove my point.

Liberalism, lacking any significant moral compass (because their compass moves at the whim of movement of the herd or uses itself as magnetic north), allows and even promotes and glorifies the behaviors that the Bible makes quite clear are deplorable. Homosexuality, drunkenness, sex outside of marriage, lying, stealing, cheating, murdering. I can take you into any of the bastions of liberal elitism and show you these things are celebrated and how many of them are in the process of being made legal to one degree or another. And it won't be conservatives that will be behind it...not real conservatives, anyway.

Liberalism on the face claims to grant individual freedom, but the dirty secret is that any responsibility is spread across the citizenry. All behaviors are acceptable, all behaviors are to be mainstreamed, laughed about, celebrated....except those behaviors that stand for scripturally sound teachings.

To liberalism, marriage doesn't matter since God is dead and it doesn't matter that something is counter to nature, it's what you feel that matters. So, if there's nothing sacred about marriage between a man and a women, then there's no reason two men can't marry. If two men can marry, then there's no reason three men and two women can't. And if there's no reason three men and two women can marry, then there's no reason a different species can be involved.

To liberalism, sex doesn't matter because it's just an act for pleasure, for happiness. After all, "the pursuit of happiness" is what the Declaration of Independence was about. If there is nothing sacred about sex, then there's no reason we have to get married. If there's no reason to limit it to marriage, then there's no reason to limit it by age or gender. Anyone physically capable of the act should be allowed---no, encouraged to have sex as early and as often as possible, right?

To liberalism, life doesn't really matter, because it's all about convenience and that much-vaunted "pursuit of happiness". Since sex is just an act of pleasure there's no reason, according the President Obama's own words, that anyone should be "punished with a baby". Only the women should be allowed to determine if the child has worth, has value, and should be allowed to live. Likewise, the old and infirm can be such a burden on the young and healthy, so why should they shoulder that burden at all? We should spread that burden across the citizenry---no, better yet, devise a way to determine if the value of the old or the infirm have enough value that maintaining their health is worth the cost. Certainly, any sensible old person could understand when they've reached the point of diminishing returns and low point of self-fulfillment....euthanasia is surely an option, right?

To liberalism, we can't be free to do what we want if we are somehow prohibited from doing so purely because we have not the means. After all, it's not fair that just because someone has exercised the freedom NOT to learn in school, exercised the freedom NOT to actually hold a job, or exercised the freedom to accumulate excessive debt, or exercised the right to impregnate five women, they should be penalized, right? Naturally, their needs and desires should be shouldered by everyone else.

To liberalism, the fact that America is an actual nation doesn't matter, since borders are simply man-made devices to oppress. People should be allowed to come and go as they please, to take what the want from the collective and give it to family in other countries--who are much less open about their borders, I might add--or squander it altogether. Whatever makes them happy, that's the cornerstone.

To liberalism, the socialist utopia is the mechanism to achieve these secular humanist goals. Otherwise, how would "social justice" come to pass? How would the "even playing field" be created? And the only way to start the socialist mechanism is through an election process whereby anyone who dares to oppose something that makes so much sense is a fair target for every sort of dirty, filthy smear, every bit of condescension. Because it hurts those people for whom accusations of infidelity, looseness, drunkenness actually means something. As I can prove throughout the media, those same accusations hold no court with liberals because those very behaviors are cause for celebration.

Yes, I hate liberalism. I didn't say I hate liberals. I may not like them very much, but I can't hate them. I believe if faced with truth they eventually could see how shallow and misguided that espousing liberalism really is.

And let me add a postscript here. The reason liberalism is so significant is because believers stopped doing what they were anointed to do, what they were commanded to do.