More on the ignorance of Olbermann

He took issue on his program with someone calling Obama a fascist. I have always maintained he's socialist (he and the liberals can call him whatever they want, but if it walks like a socialist, talks like a socialist and passes legislation that is socialist, guess what, Keith?). This latest effort by Obama to try to get legislation passed that gives government the ability to take over any business that they decide they need to, to limit executives' pay.

Let me share with you, Olbermann (and all the lemmings), the definition of a fascist: A person who believes in and supports a political philosophy, movement or regime that exalst nation above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation and forcible supression of opposition.

Hmm, I think I can easily make the case that Obama is moving dangerously close to that. He's taking over more and more business. He's spending this nation into submission to the state. And his executive orders, legislation and the types of judges he supports all point to a way effectively shut the mouths of the Godly (certainly chasing any mention of God or Christ out of public). Use of activist judges to force the socialist government's will upon those who disagree might arguably be construed as forcible suppression. Canada already jails church leaders who preach against homosexuality. And since this, among other unGodly behaviors, are Obama's poster child causes, and given the proven track record of liberal activist judges so far, is it that far of a stretch to suspect America won't be far behind?

So, Olbermann, I think one might just make the case for Obama exhibiting fascist tendencies. Are you capable of independent thought enough to acknowledge the possibility? Probably not.